Monday, June 28, 2010

This is a MUST read

Click here to see Telegraph article on money printing...

Excerpt:


RBS tells clients to prepare for 'monster' money-printing by the Federal Reserve

As recovery starts to stall in the US and Europe with echoes of mid-1931, bond experts are once again dusting off a speech by Ben Bernanke given eight years ago as a freshman governor at the Federal Reserve.


Andrew Roberts, credit chief at RBS, is advising clients to read the Bernanke text very closely because the Fed is soon going to have to the pull the lever on "monster" quantitative easing (QE)".
We cannot stress enough how strongly we believe that a cliff-edge may be around the corner, for the global banking system (particularly in Europe) and for the global economy. Think the unthinkable," he said in a note to investors.
Roberts said the Fed will shift tack, resorting to the 1940s strategy of capping bond yields around 2pc by force majeure said this is the option "which I personally prefer".
A recent paper by the San Francisco Fed argues that interest rates should now be minus 5pc under the bank's "rule of thumb" measure of capacity use and unemployment. The rate is currently minus 2pc when QE is factored in. You could conclude, very crudely, that the Fed must therefore buy another $2 trillion of bonds, and even more if Europe's EMU debacle goes from bad to worse. I suspect that this hints at the Bernanke view, but it is anathema to hardliners at the Kansas, Richmond, Philadephia, and Dallas Feds.

The Congressional Budget Office said federal stimulus from the Obama package peaked in the first quarter. The effect will turn sharply negative by next year as tax rises automatically kick in, a net swing of 4pc of GDP. This is happening as the US housing market tips into a double-dip. New homes sales crashed 33pc to a record low of 300,000 in May after subsidies expired.
It is sobering that zero rates, QE a l'outrance, and an $800bn fiscal blitz should should have delivered so little. Just as it is sobering that Club Med bond purchases by the European Central Bank and the creation of the EU's €750bn rescue "shield" have failed to stabilize Europe's debt markets. Greek default contracts reached an all-time high of 1,125 on Friday even though the €110bn EU-IMF rescue is up and running. Are investors questioning EU solvency itself, or making a judgment on German willingness to back pledges with real money?
Clearly we are nearing the end of the "Phoney War", that phase of the global crisis when it seemed as if governments could conjure away the Great Debt. The trauma has merely been displaced from banks, auto makers, and homeowners onto the taxpayer, lifting public debt in the OECD bloc from 70pc of GDP to 100pc by next year. As the Bank for International Settlements warns, sovereign debt crises are nearing "boiling point" in half the world economy.
Fiscal largesse had its place last year. It arrested the downward spiral at a crucial moment, but that moment has passed. There is a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace. The Krugman doctrine of perma-deficits is ruinous - and has in fact ruined Japan. The only plausible escape route for the West is a decade of fiscal austerity offset by helicopter drops of printed money, for as long as it takes.

Friday, June 25, 2010

The most important chart on the planet

This chart, which shows the collapse in the productivity of our total debt, is why they will "print" again.
There isn't any other way to avoid a deflationary collapse.



ECRI plunges (again!)....this is one to watch


It's getting close: the fabled -10% annualized change (see David Rosenberg) which guarantees a recession is now just 3.1% away, which at this rate of collapse will be breached in two weeks. The ECRI is now at December 2007 levels, the time when the last recession officially started. The index dropped from an annualized revised -5.8% (previously -5.7%) to -6.9%. As a reminder, from Rosie, "It is one thing to slip to or fractionally below the zero line, but a -3.5% reading has only sent off two head-fakes in the past, while accurately foreshadowing seven recessions — with a three month lag. Keep your eye on the -10 threshold, for at that level, the economy has gone into recession … only 100% of the time (42 years of data)." We are practically there.

C. deR comment:  does anybody REALLY believe that the politicians are going to wait around to see if their newly found deficit reticence is combined with a double dip??  I, for one, think not.  The deficit growth route is blocked, and that leaves only one avenue open, politically speaking.

Friday, June 18, 2010


Consumer Metrics' Indicators Rolling Over


This is one to watch


The ECRI weekly leading index is continuing its accelerating dive, and is now well into negative territory, hitting -5.7 for the past week: a 2.2 decline from the prior week. Here is why, as David Rosenberg, this is a critical indicator, and why we may have just 4.3 more points to go before the critical -10 threshold: "It is one thing to slip to or fractionally below the zero line, but a -3.5% reading has only sent off two head-fakes in the past, while accurately foreshadowing seven recessions — with a three month lag. Keep your eye on the -10 threshold, for at that level, the economy has gone into recession … only 100% of the time (42 years of data)." At this rate of decline -10 will be taken out in the first week of July.
And some more recent observations on ECRI from Rosie:
Suffice it to say, when the ECRI was drifting lower in 2007, it got to -3.5%, where are we are now, in November and unbeknownst to the consensus at the time that a recession was only one month away. Remember that the economics community did not call for recession until after Lehman collapsed — nine months after it started; and go back to 2001, and the consensus did not call for recession until after 9/11 and again the economy had been in recession for a good six months).

Friday, June 11, 2010


Trapped??

Fed trapped
(1) Stand back and let everyone go bankrupt in a deflationary collapse. This is the classical solution. You could then reorganize and not have wasted 20 years. This is brief, terrible and politically untenable.
-or-
(2) Print new base money immediately. This will seemingly be inflationary but in reality you are only pulling the money supply along to keep up with the asset inflation that has *already* occurred. Some debt may be destroyed by inflation but it is much less disruptive if it is at low levels.

Bill Gross pushed this very well in March 2009.

Gross said in order to deal with the debt load, we need a “return to nominal GDP growth levels of 5-6%, the majority of which might actually come in the form of higher prices as opposed to increased production. This Faustian bargain would be acceptable if only to stabilize what now appears to be an even more dangerous deflationary debt liquidation.”
Posted by DanHess | Report as abusive

MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2010

This is just too good to miss - Rosie

We highly recommend The Deflation Dilemma (page 18) and A Winding Path to 
Inflation (page 84) of the current Economist.  The second article is particularly 
enlightening because it shows how ineffective a policy aimed at creating 
inflation will be because the bond maturity profile of most industrialized 
countries is short.  Over half of U.S. government debt and 40% in Germany and 
France roll over within the next three years and so an overt policy to inflate away 
the massive public debts will be self-defeating if the bond vigilantes demand a 
higher premium upon refinancing time.  Besides, an inflation-is-always-around- 
the-corner culture still permeates most central banks: the Bank of Canada 
hiking, the Fed district banks clamouring for a rate hike, the tightening moves 
this year by India, Brazil and China, as well as the refusal on the part of the ECB 
to go beyond shifting the composition of its balance sheet and actually expand it 
in a classic quantitative-easing style.     

Parades and Rain - Rosie

A FEW MORE DISTURBING EMPLOYMENT TIDBITS  
First, if it weren’t for the plunge in the labour force, the U.S. unemployment rate 
would have climbed to 10% in May.  Second, the Household survey actually 
flagged a 35,000 outright decline in employment last month.  Third, the 41,000 
increase in private payrolls, about one-third of what was widely expected and the 
low-water mark for the year, was exaggerated by a 29,000 boost from the “birth- 
death” model.  Fourth, the fact that the hottest sector of the economy, 
manufacturing, could only post a 29,000 gain, a sharp slowing from 40,000 in 
April is quite disconcerting — especially since it is clear that the ISM index has 
peaked for the cycle.  Fifth, the declines in the financial sector, construction and 
State/local governments are a vivid reminder that the parts of the economy that 
were most affected by the bursting of the housing and credit bubble are still 
licking their wounds and cannot be relied upon to play any role in helping revive 
what is still very much a moribund jobs market.   
It’s not just the labour market that is behaving poorly, but the housing market is 
too.  It is remarkable that with interest rates so low that we would be seeing 
mortgage applications for new purchases down to a 13-year low.  Take a look at 
page A6 of the weekend WSJ and you will see that Ivy Zelman, the country’s best 
housing analyst, is calling for nationwide home sales to slide between 25% and 
30% in May and that is sequential, not year-on-year (that is very close to a 100% 
annual rate plunge.  Even the usually optimistic National Association of Realtors 
is expecting “June and July to remain fairly weak”).  A survey conducted by Credit 
Suisse (released on Friday) showed that in stark contrast to the latest National 
Association of Home Builders survey, the traffic of prospective homebuyers in 
May was back to depths of late 2008 when the financial crisis was in full gear. 


SATURDAY, JUNE 5, 2010

Percent job losses aligned at bottom

This is a stunner, the dotted line is corrected for the Census Hires:


Saturday, June 5, 2010

debt/GDP


US Total Government Debt Reaches 130% of GDP


Here's a postcard from off-balance-sheet country.

This includes only current debt and not future unfunded obligations.

I like to call this US debt chart "The Last Bubble," but it could equally apply to a chart showing the representation of this debt - the US bonds, notes, bills and of course dollars, which are really nothing more than Federal Reserve Notes of zero duration in the modernfiatopia.

It all adds up, eventually, and must be reconciled. It is easier to print money and accumulate debt when you own the world's reserve currency. For a while the dollar might even flourish, despite the printing, as the international savers flee ahead of the economic hitmen, from country to country, and crisis to crisis.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010


May 30, 2010 - BEA Lowers 1st Quarter GDP Estimate as the Consumer Metrics Institute Previews 3rd Quarter GDP:

On May 27th the BEA released its first revision to its 1st Quarter 2010 GDP growth rate measurement, lowering the number from a 3.2% annualized growth rate to 3.0% annualized growth. One day later the Consumer Metrics Institute's 'Daily Growth Index' was signalling what we should expect the BEA's measurement of the 3rd Quarter 2010 GDP growth rate to be: contracting at about a 2.0% rate.

The prior BEA estimate of 1st Quarter 2010 GDP growth trailed our 'Daily Growth Index' by 127 days, and because of the rapid rate that the economy was cooling when the measurements were being made the newly adjusted estimate is now trailing our 'Daily Growth Index' by 125 days. Since the 3rd Quarter of 2010 ends 125 days after May 28th (when our 'Daily Growth Index' was recording a 'growth' rate of -1.99%), if the BEA estimates continue to trail our 'Daily Growth Index' in a consistent manner we should expect that the 3rd Quarter's GDP 'growth' rate will be in the -2.0% neighborhood.

WEDNESDAY, MAY 26, 2010

TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2010

Stimulus Impact on the Economy - CBO


Change Attributable to ARRA, GDP change (percent)
 Low EstimateHigh Estimate
2009Q10.10.1
2009Q20.91.5
2009Q31.32.7
2009Q41.53.5
2010Q11.74.2
2010Q21.74.6
2010Q31.44.2
2010Q41.13.6